I will be glad to see eHarmony responding within formal web log to articles called « Marriage-Maker states Are Tied in Knots  » from Wall Street diary. The WSJ article examines some of the marriage stats circulated by online dating sites like eHarmony pros and cons of tinder the methodology used to assess such data. We chatted a bit about it subject nicely, two weeks ago when the initial WSJ article had been printed (see tale).

The WSJ article failed to aim to kindly regarding stats circulated by adult dating sites, and also for the the majority of part we agree with the writer. Anyone needs to know how these statistics are generated. Of the many adult dating sites discussed in the WSJ post, « eHarmony stands out as among a lot more cautious types ». That isn’t precisely a glowing document for eHarmony therefore, they made a decision to post an answer on the blog.

Within the eHarmony article they’re going into further precisely how they calculated that their particular dating website was accountable for 2percent of marriages in the United States, from the 12-month period ending March 2007. The majority of the information we currently knew about from a previously circulated PDF document entitled « eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics Number of eHarmony Marriages » (see Story), nevertheless article does cleanse some more details. Just what this web site post really does tv series is, eHarmony is trying to-be as open and clear the help of its analysis findings possible. I think the name « start correspondence » may undoubtedly end up being a good choice when it comes down to formal eHarmony blog.

This is actually the full eHarmony response to the Wall Street log exactly how they determine their own relationship stats. For further information on this dating site, browse all of our review of eHarmony.